EBay and the Illegal Looting of Antiquities
By Steven D. Levitt on the New York Times Blog
Archaeologists worry a lot about looting. Artifacts stolen from
historical sites fetch high prices on the black market, which gives
looters strong incentives to steal these items.
The emergence of eBay, therefore, was a nightmare for those who hated looting. Reducing transaction costs and making the market more liquid would certainly lead to more looting. EBay almost certainly had that effect in other markets, I suspect, like baseball cards and Beanie Babies.
So of course it would happen in antiquities as well, wouldn’t it?
Apparently, eBay had exactly the opposite effect on looting. It seems to have reduced it, or at least that is what this fascinating article from Archeology argues. The reason: whatever impact eBay had on the market for antiquities, it had an even bigger impact on the market for forged antiquities! The crush of faked artifacts had a sort of “lemons” effect on the illegal antiquities trade, with low-quality items driving out high-quality items. In addition, the bigger market gave forgers a stronger incentive to invest in high-quality fakes, to the point where now experts can have a hard time identifying the fakes. For instance, the author of the Archeology piece, Charles Stanish, writes:
In an antiquities store in La Paz, I recently saw about four shelves of supposed Tiwanaku (ca. A.D. 400-1000) pottery. I told the owner that most were fakes and she became irritated and called me a liar. So I simply touched one at a time, saying “fake,” “real,” “real from Tiwanaku,” “fake,” “fake made by Eugenio in Fuerabamba,” and so forth.
She paused for a moment, pulled one down that I said was real, and told me that it was also a fake. I congratulated her on the fact that her fakes were getting better and she just smiled. My mistake is an instance of what San Francisco State University archaeologist Karen Olsen Bruhns has identified as a very real problem — the experts who study the objects are sometimes being trained on fakes. As a result, they may authenticate pieces that are not real.
Even if you are not interested in antiquities, I suspect you will find
this piece fascinating reading.
(Hat tip: Larry Rothfield, who has a new book entitled The Rape of
Mesopotamia: Behind the Looting of the Iraq Museum)
|
|
(CNN) -- A Chinese man who bid nearly $40 million for a pair of controversial antique Chinese statues saidMonday he is refusing to pay for them Monday, state media reported.
Cai Mingchao, who works for China's National Treasures Fund, placed the winning bid by phone at a February 25 auction of artefacts once owned by fashion designer Yves St. Laurent, the Xinhua news agency reported.
"What I want to stress is that this money cannot be paid," Cai said at a news conference, according to Xinhua.
"Every Chinese would have liked to do like this at that moment, and I'm honored to have the chance to make the bid," Xinhua quoted Cai as saying.
"I did this on behalf of all Chinese people," he said.
It was not clear if he was acting on his own or with the authority of the Chinese government.
China said before the auction that the two pieces were stolen in the 19th century and should not be included in the auction. The two Qing Dynasty pieces, the sculpted head of a rat and a rabbit, date from the 18th century.
But Christie's auction house went ahead with the sale, stirring nationalistic passion among Chinese in and outside China.
The pieces sold for a winning bid of €31.49 million ($39.63 million).
Christie's declined to comment.
"We do not comment on the identity of our consignors or buyers, nor do we comment or speculate on the next steps that we might take in this instance," said a spokesman who declined to be named.
The auction of works from the Yves St. Laurent collection raised just over $483 million, Christie's said. That set a world record for a private collection sold at auction, the auction house said.
http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/asiapcf/03/02/china.relics/index.html
|
Asia-Pacific News
Feb 25, 2009, 2:02 GMT
Bangkok - Thailand's government has decided to return to Cambodia seven artifacts smuggled into the kingdom almost 10 years ago, media reports said Wednesday.
The Thai cabinet approved the diplomatic gesture at its weekly meeting Tuesday, days before Thailand hosts the 14th Summit of the Association of South-East Asian Nations, which will be attended by Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen.
'The return of these arti facts will help strengthen relations between Thailand and Cambodia,' government spokesman Panitan Wattanayagorn told the Bangkok Post newspaper.
The seven items, including busts of Cambodian gods and giants of the 12th or 13th century Bayon style, were part of a shipment of 43 smuggled artifacts intercepted by Thai custom officials at Samut Prakan port in May 2000.
Thailand's Fine Arts Department has verified the seven artifacts as being of Cambodian origin, but is still seeking more evidence to determine the place of origin of the remaining 36 items.
The artifacts will be on display at Bangkok's National Museum until they are returned to Cambodia, at a still unspecified date.
Thai-Cambodian relations have been tempestuous since July, last year, when the two neighbouring countries came to blows over a disputed area in the vicinity of the Pheah Vihear temple, an 11th-century Hindu temple.
Known as Phra Viharn in Thailand, the temple complex was named a World Heritage Site at a UNESCO meeting in Quebec in July despite Thai opposition on the grounds that the area surrounding the temple is still disputed by both nations.
The ancient Hindu temple, perched on a 525-metre-high cliff on the Dangrek Mountain range that defines the Thai-Cambodian border, has been the source of a sovereignty dispute for decades.
A row over the temple in 1958 led to a suspension of diplomatic relations in 1958 and eventually ended up in The Hague for an international settlement in 1962.
Cambodia won, but the Hague failed to pass judgement on the area adjacent to the temple.
Last year's renewed dispute led to clashes that claimed five lives and severely strained Thai-Cambodian diplomatic ties.
|
Anthony Alderson writes for the Guardian Weekly
February 24, 2009
Born in the time of the Khmer Rouge and later badly maimed when he stepped on a landmine, Bouth Rithy has come to symbolise the resilience of Cambodians who are moving forward and rebuilding their lives. Based at the remote temples of Koh Ker in northern Cambodia, the project manager for Heritage Watch is managing the impact of tourism on the local community, many of whom are still waking from the nightmare of the Khmer Rouge.
My father was in the Cambodian army; then one day when I was very young the Khmer Rouge came and took him away. He said he was only going to study, but he never returned. I don't know what happened, I only know that if he was alive he would have come back for us.
I remember a little of that time under the Khmer Rouge. Us children had to bring water to the workers and at one point I was chosen to be a guard at the watermelon farm – but I just sat there. I don't remember the Khmer Rouge itself very clearly. My younger brother fell ill and died during that time and my mother was sent to a farm near the Thai border.
When I was eight I went to school in Phnom Penh. A few years later I enrolled in a police training programme. I was underage, but in Cambodia it's easy to get around that. A year and a half later, as a police officer, I was moved to a patrol near the Thai border. That's where I stood on a landmine.
The mine took my leg off and destroyed my life. I had to start again from zero. It seemed that my family and friends didn't want to communicate with me. In those days it was very hard for disabled people; charities and the government have since done a lot to improve awareness. I moved back to Phnom Penh and received treatment in the police hospital. I was given a prosthetic limb and gradually I began to find a new life.
Before long I got a job as a security guard with a Catholic organisation called Maryknoll. I was bought a bicycle and sent to English classes. That's when my life started again. Now I can ride a motorbike, too, and even drive a car.
That was more than 10 years ago. Now I work for a preservation organisation called Heritage Watch. I'm based in northern Cambodia, among the temple ruins of Koh Ker. My job is to help raise money from tourism to help the local people.
The villagers here in Koh Ker are very poor – they suffer from a lack of education and bad living conditions. They were once firmly under the control of the Khmer Rouge, so they don’t talk very much. They're closed up and it's as if they don't understand communication very well; if you ask them a question they answer with only one or two words. If you don't ask, they don't talk.
However, in the time that I've been here the people seem to have become friendlier and more open. I try to work with them to give them emotional support and to make them less scared of talking to people.
Not long ago Heritage Watch decided to provide them with some training. We taught them about Khmer culture and literature, how to read and write and how to run a business. People here don't know about business. If they sell a chicken, for example, they don’t care how big the chicken is, it will be the same price. We also gave them English lessons to help them communicate with the tourists. We did well, but ran out of funding.
When visitors come to Koh Ker they tend to be on organised tours, and they don't have enough time to see all of the temple complex. We would like to see tourism agencies scheduling in visits to the village so that tourists can see the daily activities of the community. That way the locals might gain some benefit from the visits – even if it's only one dollar.
When I first arrived here the villagers didn't seem interested in the temples, and they certainly didn't understand that they could make money from them like in Angkor Wat. We explained to them why they should be more active in protecting their local heritage, and that when they went into the fields and saw looting or illegal logging they should tell the police or the relevant protection authorities.
We bought them bicycles and set up a "community heritage patrol", encouraging them to go out every day and report any illegal activities. We don't ask them to interfere with the looters or loggers, however, as they might have guns and it would be too dangerous.
My biggest success so far has been getting the local people to understand and work together with the protection and management authority for Angkor and Siem Reap, known as Apsara. Before, if the locals witnessed looting, they wouldn't know who to tell. Now, between 50 and 70 villagers are employed by the authority. The money helps to buy clothes for the children or pay for hospital visits.
There are still some landmines around, but not as many as before. The Cambodian Mine Action Centre, or CMAC, has been busy removing unexploded ordinance from the war. It's a dangerous job for them and their children, who live with them all the time as they move from place to place. Mines are the main cause of disability in Cambodia, although traffic accidents are becoming another big cause.
I got married seven years ago and have two children – one daughter, six, and one boy, four. They have the same birthday. They don't live here with me, but I call my wife every day on the mobile phone and see them when I visit Phnom Penh. Three months ago they came to visit me. They thought the temple was impressive, but couldn't understand how I live here. It's very quiet, there is no market and no healthcare; I have to do everything for myself. Before I came here I couldn't cook or prepare food, but now I can. I've learned a lot.
Original story:
http://www.guardianweekly.co.uk/?page=editorial&id=959&catID=7
|
The Associated Press
February 17, 2009
Cambodia's great ancient city of Angkor Wat may have been brought to an end some 600 years ago by sudden weather changes that caused massive drought — not just by rival Siamese forces and widespread deforestation as previously suspected, a researcher said Tuesday.
Brendan M. Buckley said bands from tree rings that he and his colleagues examined show that Southeast Asia was hit by a severe and prolonged drought from 1415 until 1439, coinciding with the period during which many archeologists believe Angkor collapsed.
From the city of famed temples, Angkorian kings ruled over most of Southeast Asia between the 9th and 14th centuries. They oversaw construction of architectural stone marvels, including Angkor Wat, regarded as a wonder of religious architecture and designated a World Heritage Site by UNESCO.
While the 1431 invasion from Siam — what is now Thailand — has long been regarded as a main cause of Angkor's fall, archaeologists working at the sprawling temple site have suspected that ecological factors played a major part in its collapse.
"Given all the stress the Khmer civilization was under due to political reasons and so forth, a drought of the magnitude we see in our records should have played a significant role in causing its demise," said Buckley, a research scientist at Columbia University's Tree-Ring Laboratory in New York.
The thickness of a tree's rings provides scientists with a historical record of a region's climate. Wet periods encourage tree growth, making rings thicker, while dry periods create thinner rings.
Buckley, one of the world's top tree ring experts, has spent the past 16 years taking core samples from trees across Southeast Asia to build a record of the region's climate dating back hundreds of years.
Buckley — who spoke on the sidelines of a three-day climate conference in Vietnam_ said his data helped identify at least four mega-droughts in Southeast Asia dating back 722 years.
The Greater Angkor Project — run by the University of Sydney in collaboration with the French archaeological group Ecole Francaise d'Extreme Orient and APSARA, the body responsible for management of the Angkor World Heritage Park — concluded in 2007 that ancient Angkor had become unwieldy. Efforts to expand rice production to support a population of 1 million led to vast deforestation, top soil degradation and erosion.
Dan Penny, a University of Sydney researcher who is a director at the Greater Angkor Project, said the new findings on drought will help researchers gain a greater understanding of why the kingdom collapsed.
"Angkor was a civilization obsessed with managing water. It was an agrarian society," said Penny, who also spoke at the conference. "It's hard to imagine that a society like that could have shrugged off 20 or 30 years of drought."
Penny said the drought was likely the final blow to a kingdom already suffering the effects of deforestation and attacks from the Siamese and the Cham of southern Vietnam. Sediment samples show no evidence that Angkor was overwhelmed by a "dust bowl" like drought, he said.
"We have these droughts occurring on top of preexisting pressures," Penny said. "Climate change was an accelerant. It's like pouring petrol on a fire. It makes a social and economic pressures that may have been endurable disastrous."
|
|
|